Furthermore, as like-minded mathematical theorists who have infiltrated the physics establishment are able to ruthlessly exploit the incestuous peer review procedure in order to maintain an unofficial system of thought control, reasoned criticism of Einstein's theories is consistently ignored. By implication, those who do criticise relativity theory by drawing attention to intrinsic flaws that result in obvious contradictions, which have been disguised as intriguing paradoxes, should be dismissed as foolish incompetents. Consequently, many academically qualified experimental physicists who have serious doubts about the theory are deterred from casting aspersions on the reputed intellectual prowess of Albert Einstein (1879-1955) for fear of ridicule or loss of position. Moreover, as a consequence of their widespread acceptance within the higher echelons of theoretical physics, intelligent criticism of Einstein’s mathematical depiction of relativity theory is neither welcomed, nor is it respected, even though it doesn’t require the services of a genius to prove that there are numerous profound flaws in his inventive train of thought. Therefore, it’s hardly surprising that some of the quirkier elements of Einstein’s theories about physical effects that allegedly result from relative motion have been co-opted as fundamental principles that now underpin a kind of religion that is cloaked in a pseudoscientific coat of mathematical respectability.

Despite the fact that only a small number of physicists were prepared to take Einstein’s theories seriously when they were first published, as opposed to the majority who drew attention to conspicuous errors and inconsistencies, nowadays, many theoretical physicists actively encourage members of the public to believe that both the special and general theory of relativity have been elevated to the level of proven scientific facts.

Kelly time clock